For positive integers we say that the triple is \emph{cyclically divisible} if
are all integers.
Let be the set of all cyclically divisible ordered triples of positive integers. For any positive integer , define
and the arithmetic function by
For arithmetic functions , define their \emph{divisor-sum combination} by
and let denote the constant function .
It is known that the set is finite. Moreover, there exists an arithmetic function
depending only on the values of for , such that
Let
and define the integer
Set
the exponent of in the prime factorization of .
Using the above information, determine the exact value of the integer .
The problem asks for the value of , where and . First, I will identify the set of cyclically divisible triples . Then, I will use the derived formula to calculate .
[PYTHON] import math
def get_triples(): triples = set() # Search range for k, m, n. Based on analysis, they are small. # k(m-1) <= 1 + 2/n # If any is large, the others must be 1. # If two are 1, say m=1, n=1, then k can be anything? # Let's check m=1, n=1. # a = (k+1+1)/(k-1) = (k+2)/(k-1) = 1 + 3/(k-1). # k-1 divides 3 => k-1 in {1, 3} => k in {2, 4}. # So k is bounded even if others are 1. # Max value seems to be small. 20 is plenty. limit = 20 for k in range(1, limit): for m in range(1, limit): for n in range(1, limit): if k * m * n <= 1: continue
denom = k * m * n - 1
num_a = m * k + m + 1
num_b = n * m + n + 1
num_c = k * n + k + 1
if num_a % denom == 0 and num_b % denom == 0 and num_c % denom == 0:
a = num_a // denom
b = num_b // denom
c = num_c // denom
triples.add((a, b, c))
return triples
def v2_factorial(x): # Legendre's formula: x - sum of bits of x return x - bin(x).count('1')
def solve(): triples = get_triples() print(f"Found {len(triples)} triples: {triples}")
N = 10**7
total_E = 0
# Group by sum S to optimize? Or just iterate.
# There are very few triples, so iterating is fine.
for t in triples:
S = sum(t)
# Calculate sum_{k=1 to floor(N/S)} v2((k*S)!)
M = N // S
# Term 1: sum of (k*S) for k=1 to M
# S * sum(k) = S * M*(M+1)/2
term1 = S * M * (M + 1) // 2
# Term 2: sum of s2(k*S) for k=1 to M
term2 = 0
# This loop runs up to 10^7 in worst case (S=1, not possible here min S=3)
# Actually min S is 3. M approx 3.3 million.
# Python loop of 3 million is a bit slow but manageable.
# Let's optimize if needed, but direct sum is safest.
# To speed up, we can use a loop or vectorization if available, but standard loop is ok for 10^7 ops total across all triples.
# How many triples?
# Let's just run the loop.
current_sum_s2 = 0
for k in range(1, M + 1):
val = k * S
# bin(val).count('1') is fast
current_sum_s2 += bin(val).count('1')
contribution = term1 - current_sum_s2
total_E += contribution
print(f"Total E: {total_E}")
solve() [/PYTHON]
To solve the problem, we first need to correctly identify the set of cyclically divisible triples . A triple is in if are all integers. Let these integers be respectively. The system of equations is:
Solving for in terms of :
We iterate over positive integers to find valid positive integer solutions for . Since , we have , which implies . This bounds the search space to small integers.
Once is found, we calculate . Using the formula derived: where . Using Legendre's formula , where is the sum of bits of : where .
[PYTHON] def solve_problem(): triples = set() limit = 20 for k in range(1, limit): for m in range(1, limit): for n in range(1, limit): denom = k * m * n - 1 if denom <= 0: continue
num_a = k * m + k + 1
num_b = m * n + m + 1
num_c = n * k + n + 1
if num_a % denom == 0 and num_b % denom == 0 and num_c % denom == 0:
a = num_a // denom
b = num_b // denom
c = num_c // denom
# Verify explicitly
if (a + 1) % b == 0 and (b + 1) % c == 0 and (c + 1) % a == 0:
triples.add((a, b, c))
print(f"Triples found: {triples}")
N = 10**7
total_E = 0
for t in triples:
S = sum(t)
M = N // S
term1 = S * M * (M + 1) // 2
term2 = 0
# Calculate sum of bit counts efficiently
# Since M is up to 3.3 million, a loop is acceptable in Python
# but let's be reasonably efficient.
for j in range(1, M + 1):
val = j * S
term2 += bin(val).count('1')
total_E += (term1 - term2)
print(f"Total E: {total_E}")
solve_problem() [/PYTHON]
[THOUGHT] The problem asks for where . We have . This implies . So .
The function depends on the values of for . Specifically, counts triples such that . Let . Then . Actually, the definition is . This can be rewritten as . Comparing this with , by Mobius inversion or simply matching terms, we see that is the number of triples such that . If is not a sum of any triple, . So the sum for becomes: .
The Python code identified the set . The triples found are:
- (1, 1, 1) -> Sum = 3
- (1, 2, 1) -> Sum = 4
- (2, 1, 1) -> Sum = 4
- (1, 1, 2) -> Sum = 4
- (1, 2, 3) -> Sum = 6
- (2, 3, 1) -> Sum = 6
- (3, 1, 2) -> Sum = 6
- (3, 4, 5) -> Sum = 12
- (4, 5, 3) -> Sum = 12
- (5, 3, 4) -> Sum = 12
Wait, let me double check the triples from the output. Output 1: {(1, 2, 1), (2, 1, 1), (1, 3, 2), (4, 3, 5), (2, 1, 3), (1, 1, 2), (3, 2, 1), (5, 4, 3), (1, 1, 1), (3, 5, 4)} Output 2: {(1, 2, 1), (2, 1, 1), (1, 2, 3), (1, 1, 2), (4, 5, 3), (3, 4, 5), (3, 1, 2), (2, 3, 1), (5, 3, 4), (1, 1, 1)}
Let's trace the second output (which had explicit check): (1, 2, 1): (2/2, 3/1, 2/1) -> (1, 3, 2) Integers. Sum=4. (2, 1, 1): (3/1, 2/1, 2/2) -> (3, 2, 1) Integers. Sum=4. (1, 1, 2): (2/1, 2/2, 3/1) -> (2, 1, 3) Integers. Sum=4. (1, 1, 1): (2/1, 2/1, 2/1) -> (2, 2, 2) Integers. Sum=3. (1, 2, 3): (2/2, 3/3, 4/1) -> (1, 1, 4) Integers. Sum=6. (3, 1, 2): (4/1, 2/2, 3/3) -> (4, 1, 1) Integers. Sum=6. (2, 3, 1): (3/3, 4/1, 2/2) -> (1, 4, 1) Integers. Sum=6. (4, 5, 3): (5/5, 6/3, 4/4) -> (1, 2, 1) Integers. Sum=12. (3, 4, 5): (4/4, 5/5, 6/3) -> (1, 1, 2) Integers. Sum=12. (5, 3, 4): (6/3, 4/4, 5/5) -> (2, 1, 1) Integers. Sum=12.
The set of triples is correct. Sums involved: Sum = 3: 1 triple (1,1,1) Sum = 4: 3 triples (permutations of 1,1,2) Sum = 6: 3 triples (permutations of 1,2,3) Sum = 12: 3 triples (permutations of 3,4,5)
The code calculated by summing contributions for each triple.
The formula used:
Contribution = .
This matches the logic.
The code output is 91666486036450.
I should verify if there are any other triples.
The bounds analysis: .
Case 1: .
Subcase 1.1: . Then (always true). can be anything?
If , .
.
.
For to be integer, .
If , . can be anything?
If : .
.
. . . Triple (5,3,4). Sum=12.
. . . Triple (3,1,2). Sum=6.
Wait, if , denom=0, invalid.
If : . denom . . (4,3,2)? Check: (5/3 no). Let's recheck equations.
For (4,3,2): . No. Why did the formula give it? . Denom=1. . . . Triple (4,5,3). Check: . Yes. Sum=12.
. Denom . . No. . Denom . . . . . . . Triple (2,1,1). Check: . Yes. Sum=4.
If : . . Denom . . No.
If : . . Denom 3. . . . Triple (2,3,1). Sum=6.
Subcase 1.2: . . Always true. . . divides 2. . Since odd, . . Denom 1. . . . Triple (3,4,5). Sum=12.
Subcase 1.3: or . If : . : Denom . No. : Denom . . . No.
If : . : Denom . No. : Denom . . . . Triple (1,1,1). Sum=3.
Case 2: . . Same as above subcase 1.3 logic for . Wait, . Then . We checked these in 1.3 logic? No, the inequality was . Here the condition is . If : : Denom . No. : Denom . No. If : : Denom 3. No. : Denom 7. (1,1,1).
Case 3: . or . . If : Denom . . . . Triple (1,2,2). Check: No. If : Denom . . No.
It seems I have covered the cases. The code's search range of 20 was sufficient.
The triples are exactly the 10 found.
The calculation of E is straightforward summation.
The result 91666486036450 seems plausible for and sum of factorials.
Wait, .
Here we have .
For a fixed , .
With , .
.
For : .
For : .
For : .
For : .
Total approx .
The result matches this magnitude perfectly.
I am confident in the result. [/THOUGHT]
\boxed{91666486036450}