Problem Analysis #6

59.05s
15,874 toks
Problem Statement

Let f1f_1 and f2f_2 be two Boolean functions defined on F2n\mathbb{F}_2^n for some n>0n>0. We say f1f_1 and f2f_2 are equivalent with respect to aa if deg(f1f2)a\deg(f_1-f_2)\le a.

For a Boolean function ff of degree kk, a fast point of order \ell for ff is defined as a nonzero element xF2nx\in\mathbb{F}_2^n such that deg(Dxf)k1\deg(D_xf)\le k-1-\ell where DafD_af is the map on F2n\mathbb{F}_2^n defined as uf(u+x)f(u)u\mapsto f(u+x)-f(u).

Let C\mathcal{C} be the binary Hamming code H7\mathcal{H}_7 of length 2712^7-1. We define FF be the set of the Boolean functions of degree 44 up to equivalence with respect to 22, such that the set of fast points of order 22 with 0\mathbf{0} is equal to C\mathcal{C}. Find F|F|.

Ground Truth
1180591616319665772160
Execution Trace
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] Let me break down this problem step by step.

  1. We're working over F2n\mathbb{F}_2^n where n=7n = 7 (since the Hamming code H7\mathcal{H}_7 has length 271=1272^7 - 1 = 127).

Wait, let me reconsider. The Hamming code H7\mathcal{H}_7 is a [7,4,3][7, 4, 3] code, meaning it has length 7, dimension 4, and minimum distance 3. So we're working in F27\mathbb{F}_2^7.

  1. We need Boolean functions ff of degree 4 on F27\mathbb{F}_2^7.

  2. A fast point of order 2 for ff is a nonzero xF27x \in \mathbb{F}_2^7 such that deg(Dxf)412=1\deg(D_x f) \leq 4 - 1 - 2 = 1.

  3. The set of fast points of order 2 together with 0\mathbf{0} should equal C\mathcal{C} (the Hamming code).

  4. Two functions are equivalent with respect to 2 if their difference has degree at most 2.

Let me think about this more carefully. For a degree 4 Boolean function, the derivative Dxf(u)=f(u+x)f(u)D_x f(u) = f(u+x) - f(u) has degree at most 3 in general. We want deg(Dxf)1\deg(D_x f) \leq 1 for xx to be a fast point of order 2.

The Hamming code H7\mathcal{H}_7 has 24=162^4 = 16 codewords (including 0\mathbf{0}), so we need exactly 15 nonzero fast points of order 2.

Let me write code to explore this problem. [/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] import numpy as np from itertools import combinations, product from functools import reduce

Work in F_2^7

n = 7

Generate all elements of F_2^7

elements = [tuple(int(b) for b in format(i, f'0{n}b')) for i in range(2**n)] elements_array = np.array(elements, dtype=np.uint8)

Generate the Hamming code H_7

H_7 is the [7,4,3] code. Its parity check matrix H has columns that are all nonzero binary vectors of length 3

Generator matrix G can be constructed from this

Parity check matrix for H_7 (columns are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 in binary)

H = np.array([ [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1], [1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1] ], dtype=np.uint8)

Codewords are vectors c such that H @ c = 0 (mod 2)

hamming_code = [] for i in range(2**n): c = np.array([int(b) for b in format(i, f'0{n}b')], dtype=np.uint8) if np.all(H @ c % 2 == 0): hamming_code.append(tuple(c))

print(f"Hamming code has {len(hamming_code)} codewords") print("Codewords:", hamming_code[:5], "...") [/PYTHON]

Tool Output
[PYTHON OUTPUT] Hamming code has 16 codewords Codewords: [(np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0)), (np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(1)), (np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(0)), (np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(1)), (np.uint8(0), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(1), np.uint8(0), np.uint8(1))] ... [/PYTHON OUTPUT]
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] Let me continue analyzing this problem more carefully. I need to run more code to actually solve the problem - the previous output just confirmed the Hamming code structure. Let me continue with the full computation. [/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] import numpy as np from itertools import combinations, product from functools import reduce

Work in F_2^7

n = 7

Generate all elements of F_2^7

elements = [tuple(int(b) for b in format(i, f'0{n}b')) for i in range(2**n)]

Parity check matrix for H_7

H = np.array([ [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1], [1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1] ], dtype=np.uint8)

Get Hamming code codewords

hamming_code = set() for i in range(2**n): c = np.array([int(b) for b in format(i, f'0{n}b')], dtype=np.uint8) if np.all(H @ c % 2 == 0): hamming_code.add(tuple(c))

For a Boolean function f of degree k, represented by its ANF (algebraic normal form)

The monomials of degree d in n variables correspond to subsets of {0,1,...,n-1} of size d

A degree 4 Boolean function has monomials of degree 0,1,2,3,4

We care about equivalence up to degree 2, so we only need to count degree 3 and 4 parts

For x to be a fast point of order 2, we need deg(D_x f) <= 1

D_x f(u) = f(u+x) + f(u) (in F_2)

For a monomial m = x_{i1} * x_{i2} * ... * x_{id},

D_a m(u) = m(u+a) + m(u)

The key insight: for a degree 4 function f, D_x f has degree <= 1 iff

the degree 4 and degree 3 parts of D_x f are zero.

Let's think about this algebraically. If f has ANF with degree 4 terms,

then D_x f involves derivatives of those terms.

For a monomial prod_{i in S} x_i where |S|=4,

D_a (prod_{i in S} x_i) = prod_{i in S}(x_i + a_i) + prod_{i in S} x_i

This has degree 3 if a has exactly one 1 in positions S, degree 2 if two 1s, etc.

Actually, for D_x f to have degree <= 1, we need:

- All degree 4 monomials: D_x of them should have degree <= 1

- All degree 3 monomials: D_x of them should have degree <= 1

For a degree 4 monomial m_S = prod_{i in S} x_i, D_x m_S has degree 4 - |S ∩ supp(x)|

where supp(x) is the support of x.

So D_x m_S has degree <= 1 iff |S ∩ supp(x)| >= 3

For a degree 3 monomial m_T, D_x m_T has degree <= 1 iff |T ∩ supp(x)| >= 2

So x is a fast point of order 2 iff:

- For every degree 4 monomial S in f: |S ∩ supp(x)| >= 3

- For every degree 3 monomial T in f: |T ∩ supp(x)| >= 2

We want the set of such x (plus 0) to equal the Hamming code.

Let's enumerate degree 4 monomials and degree 3 monomials

deg4_monomials = list(combinations(range(n), 4)) # 35 monomials deg3_monomials = list(combinations(range(n), 3)) # 35 monomials

print(f"Number of degree 4 monomials: {len(deg4_monomials)}") print(f"Number of degree 3 monomials: {len(deg3_monomials)}")

Convert Hamming code to supports (nonzero positions)

hamming_nonzero = [c for c in hamming_code if c != (0,)*n] print(f"Nonzero Hamming codewords: {len(hamming_nonzero)}") [/PYTHON]

Tool Output
[PYTHON OUTPUT] Number of degree 4 monomials: 35 Number of degree 3 monomials: 35 Nonzero Hamming codewords: 15 [/PYTHON OUTPUT]
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] I need to continue the computation to find the actual answer. Let me run more code to complete the analysis. [/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] import numpy as np from itertools import combinations, product

n = 7

Parity check matrix for H_7

H = np.array([ [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1], [1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1] ], dtype=np.uint8)

Get Hamming code codewords

hamming_code = set() for i in range(2**n): c = tuple(int(b) for b in format(i, f'0{n}b')) c_arr = np.array(c, dtype=np.uint8) if np.all(H @ c_arr % 2 == 0): hamming_code.add(c)

hamming_nonzero = [c for c in hamming_code if c != (0,)*n]

Get supports of nonzero Hamming codewords

def support(c): return frozenset(i for i in range(n) if c[i] == 1)

hamming_supports = [support(c) for c in hamming_nonzero] non_hamming_nonzero = [] for i in range(1, 2**n): c = tuple(int(b) for b in format(i, f'0{n}b')) if c not in hamming_code: non_hamming_nonzero.append(c)

non_hamming_supports = [support(c) for c in non_hamming_nonzero]

deg4_monomials = list(combinations(range(n), 4)) deg3_monomials = list(combinations(range(n), 3))

For x to be a fast point of order 2:

- For every deg 4 monomial S in f: |S ∩ supp(x)| >= 3

- For every deg 3 monomial T in f: |T ∩ supp(x)| >= 2

For x NOT to be a fast point:

- There exists deg 4 monomial S in f with |S ∩ supp(x)| <= 2, OR

- There exists deg 3 monomial T in f with |T ∩ supp(x)| <= 1

We need: fast points = hamming_nonzero (exactly)

For each x in hamming_nonzero: x IS a fast point

For each x not in hamming (and nonzero): x is NOT a fast point

Let's build constraint matrices

For deg4 monomial S and element x: constraint is |S ∩ supp(x)| >= 3 (for x to be fast)

This means: if |S ∩ supp(x)| <= 2, then S must NOT be in f (for x in Hamming)

And: if |S ∩ supp(x)| <= 2 for some S in f, then x is not fast (good for non-Hamming)

For Hamming codewords to be fast points:

For each x in Hamming nonzero, for each deg4 S: if |S ∩ supp(x)| <= 2, then S not in f

For each x in Hamming nonzero, for each deg3 T: if |T ∩ supp(x)| <= 1, then T not in f

Find forbidden deg4 monomials (those that would make some Hamming point not fast)

forbidden_deg4 = set() for x_supp in hamming_supports: for S in deg4_monomials: S_set = frozenset(S) if len(S_set & x_supp) <= 2: forbidden_deg4.add(S)

forbidden_deg3 = set() for x_supp in hamming_supports: for T in deg3_monomials: T_set = frozenset(T) if len(T_set & x_supp) <= 1: forbidden_deg3.add(T)

allowed_deg4 = [S for S in deg4_monomials if S not in forbidden_deg4] allowed_deg3 = [T for T in deg3_monomials if T not in forbidden_deg3]

print(f"Allowed deg4 monomials: {len(allowed_deg4)}") print(f"Allowed deg3 monomials: {len(allowed_deg3)}") print(f"Allowed deg4: {allowed_deg4}") print(f"Allowed deg3: {allowed_deg3}") [/PYTHON]

Tool Output
[PYTHON OUTPUT] Allowed deg4 monomials: 0 Allowed deg3 monomials: 0 Allowed deg4: [] Allowed deg3: [] [/PYTHON OUTPUT]
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] The computation shows that there are no allowed degree 4 or degree 3 monomials that satisfy the constraint that all Hamming codewords are fast points of order 2. This means there are no Boolean functions of degree 4 (up to equivalence with respect to 2) such that the set of fast points of order 2 together with 0 equals the Hamming code.

Wait, but the problem asks for degree 4 functions. If there are no allowed degree 4 monomials, then the only function would be one with no degree 4 or degree 3 terms, which would have degree at most 2, not degree 4.

This means there are no such Boolean functions of degree exactly 4 satisfying the given conditions. Therefore |F| = 0. [/THOUGHT]

\boxed{0}

Final Model Output
0

Comparative Analysis (P6) (Average across runs)

Avg Time Taken

Gemma-3-27B
3068.8
GPT-oss-20B (high)
2327.7
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
1860.0
Grok-4.1-fast
709.0
Deepseek-V3.2
408.9
GPT-5.1 (high)
284.3
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
248.8
Deepseek-R1-distill-Qwen-32B (high)
236.2
Qwen3-30B-A3B-2507
217.9
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
89.0
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
68.1
HCX-007(high)
44.7
Claude-Opus-4.5
35.8
A.X-4.0 (72B)
29.1

Avg Token Usage

GPT-oss-20B (high)
285147.3
Grok-4.1-fast
268249.3
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
59300.0
Deepseek-V3.2
44786.3
GPT-5.1 (high)
23083.7
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
13473.3
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
11202.0
Claude-Opus-4.5
8828.3
HCX-007(high)
8648.7
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
6208.0
A.X-4.0 (72B)
6089.3
Deepseek-R1-distill-Qwen-32B (high)
5731.0
Qwen3-30B-A3B-2507
5213.3
Gemma-3-27B
2095.3