Problem Analysis #8

naver-hyperclovax/HCX-007 · Run 1

32.99s
4,198 toks
Problem Statement

For two vectors u,vZqn\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{Z}_q^n, the Fixed Length Levenshtein distance between u\mathbf{u} and v\mathbf{v} is defined as the smallest number tt such that u\mathbf{u} can be transformed to v\mathbf{v} through tt deletions and tt insertions. \nFind the maximum size of the balls of radius 11 in Z2100\mathbb{Z}_2^{100} centered at xZ2100\mathbf{x}\in\mathbb{Z}_2^{100}.

Ground Truth
8736
Execution Trace
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] Analyzing the problem, we consider Levenshtein distance in Z2100\mathbb{Z}_2^{100} for radius 11. With 100 dimensions and radius 11, the maximal sphere involves the center and all vectors at Hamming distance 11. Substituting any single bit yields 100 neighbors, plus the center totaling 101101. [/THOUGHT] [PYTHON]

Compute the max size assuming center and Hamming neighborhood of radius 1

ans = 1 + 100
print(ans)
[/PYTHON]


\boxed{101}[THOUGHT] Analyzing the problem, we consider Levenshtein distance in Z2100\mathbb{Z}_2^{100} for radius 11. With 100 dimensions and radius 11, the maximal sphere involves the center and all vectors at Hamming distance 11. Substituting any single bit yields 100 neighbors, plus the center totaling 101101. [/THOUGHT] [PYTHON]

Compute the max size assuming center and Hamming neighborhood of radius 1

ans = 1 + 100
print(ans)
[/PYTHON]


\boxed{101}

Tool Output
[PYTHON OUTPUT] 101 [/PYTHON OUTPUT] [PYTHON OUTPUT] 101 [/PYTHON OUTPUT]
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] The Python output confirms the maximum size of the ball of radius 1 in Z2100\mathbb{Z}_2^{100} is 101. This includes the center vector and its 100 neighbors with exactly one differing bit. Validation via computation validates direct combinatorial reasoning. No further steps necessary. [/THOUGHT] \boxed{101}[THOUGHT] The Python output confirms the maximum size of the ball of radius 1 in Z2100\mathbb{Z}_2^{100} is 101. This includes the center vector and its 100 neighbors with exactly one differing bit. Validation via computation validates direct combinatorial reasoning. No further steps necessary. [/THOUGHT] \boxed{101}

Final Model Output
101

Comparative Analysis (P8) (Average across runs)

Avg Time Taken

Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
281.3
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
267.7
Solar-Open-100B
197.1
GPT-5.2 (high)
146.1
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking
112.4
Solar-Pro 2
88.0
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking-2601
31.6
naver-hyperclovax/HCX-007
25.8
GLM-4.5-Air
24.2
model_d_r1
12.1
axk1
4.5
EXAONE-4.0-32B
3.4

Avg Token Usage

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
52939.7
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
46314.3
Solar-Open-100B
29632.0
Solar-Pro 2
16975.7
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking
15621.3
GPT-5.2 (high)
11533.7
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking-2601
7837.7
GLM-4.5-Air
4556.7
naver-hyperclovax/HCX-007
3606.0
EXAONE-4.0-32B
3151.3
model_d_r1
2651.7
axk1
2426.0