Problem Analysis #44

194.36s
14,552 toks
Problem Statement

Let f(x)f(x) be an increasing continuous function on the entire real line, and let f1(x)f^{-1}(x) be its inverse function. The function f1(x)f^{-1}(x) satisfies the following conditions:\begin{center}\fbox{\begin{minipage}{0.9\textwidth}(A) For x1|x| \leq 1,4(f1(x))2=x2(x25)2.4 \left(f^{-1}(x)\right)^2 = x^2(x^2 - 5)^2.(B) For x>1|x| > 1,f1(x)=ex1+1.\left|f^{-1}(x)\right| = e^{|x|-1} + 1.\end{minipage}}\end{center}For a real number mm, let g(m)g(m) denote the number of intersection points between the line of slope mm passing through (1,0)(1,0) and the curve y=f(x)y = f(x). Suppose that g(m)g(m) is discontinuous at m=am = a and m=bm = b with a<ba < b. Evaluateg(a)×(limma+g(m))+g(b)×(lnbb)2.g(a) \times \left(\lim_{m \to a^+} g(m)\right)+ g(b) \times \left( \frac{\ln b}{b} \right)^{2}.(Here, you may use limxlnxx=0\displaystyle\lim_{x \to \infty} \dfrac{\ln x}{x} = 0.) [4 points]\

Ground Truth
11
Execution Trace
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] I will model the inverse function p(t)=f^{-1}(t) from the given conditions, then for each slope m solve the intersection condition p(t)=1+t/m (equivalent to f(x)=m(x-1)). By scanning m>0 and counting real roots in t, I can detect where g(m) jumps (discontinuities), identify a<b, and then compute the requested expression using the corresponding values and one-sided limit. [/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] import mpmath as mp

def p(t): # f^{-1}(t) if abs(t) <= 1: return t*(5 - t2)/2 elif t > 1: return mp.e(t-1) + 1 else: # t < -1 return -(mp.e**(-t-1) + 1)

def count_roots(m, tmin=-20, tmax=20, n=20000): # count roots of F(t)=p(t)-(1+t/m) for m!=0 if m == 0: # y=0 intersects f at x=p(0)=0 once return 1 def F(t): return p(t) - (1 + t/m) # sample and find sign changes and near-zeros ts = [tmin + (tmax-tmin)i/n for i in range(n+1)] Fs = [F(t) for t in ts] roots = [] for i in range(n): a,b = ts[i], ts[i+1] fa,fb = Fs[i], Fs[i+1] if mp.isnan(fa) or mp.isnan(fb): continue if fa == 0: roots.append(a) if fafb < 0: try: r = mp.findroot(F, (a,b)) except: # fallback bisection try: r = mp.bisection(F, a, b) except: continue roots.append(r) # unique roots within tolerance roots_sorted = sorted(roots) uniq=[] for r in roots_sorted: if not uniq or abs(r-uniq[-1])>1e-5: uniq.append(r) return len(uniq), uniq

probe g(m) for various m

ms = [ -5,-1,-0.5,-0.1,0,0.05,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.3333333,0.34,0.5,0.8,1,1.5,2,5] for m in ms: if m==0: print(m, 1, []) else: cnt, roots = count_roots(m, tmin=-30, tmax=30, n=20000) print(m, cnt, roots[:5]) print("done") [/PYTHON]

Tool Output
[PYTHON OUTPUT] -5 1 [mpf('0.38057831631355047')] -1 1 [mpf('0.28916854644830997')] -0.5 1 [mpf('0.22346207166923527')] -0.1 1 [mpf('0.080020495744765053')] 0 1 [] 0.05 3 [mpf('-5.7225105558299684'), mpf('-0.057137527522353585'), mpf('5.7438645183905783')] 0.1 3 [mpf('-4.8365572013618662'), mpf('-0.13317586785827026'), mpf('4.889720169867429')] 0.2 3 [mpf('-3.8469185788029901'), mpf('-0.38829144100474458'), mpf('3.994308347002122')] 0.3 3 [mpf('-3.1336231627580765'), mpf('-0.84192591779362156'), mpf('3.4392164832802044')] 0.3333333 3 [mpf('-2.9038139291589366'), mpf('-0.99999984999999062'), mpf('3.289281558244707')] 0.34 3 [mpf('-2.8565513241530893'), mpf('-1.0305458265567029'), mpf('3.2607743632974532')] 0.5 1 [mpf('2.6783469900166607')] 0.8 1 [mpf('1.8243883090329845')] 1 1 [mpf('1.0000000003142502')] 1.5 1 [mpf('0.60621251731036443')] 2 1 [mpf('0.53918887281088912')] 5 1 [mpf('0.4553007089750444')] done [/PYTHON OUTPUT]
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] From the Python output, (g(m)=1) for (m\le 0), while for small (m>0) (e.g. (0.05,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.34)) we have (g(m)=3). Hence (a=0), (g(a)=g(0)=1), and (\lim_{m\to a^+}g(m)=3), so the first term equals (1\cdot 3=3).

The other jump occurs where (g(m)) changes from (3) to (1) (since at (m=0.5), (g(m)=1)), which happens at a tangency for the branch (|t|>1) on the negative side. This tangency gives the condition (\ln b=-2b), hence (\left(\frac{\ln b}{b}\right)^2=4). At the tangency the line meets the curve in exactly 2 distinct points, so (g(b)=2). Thus the second term is (2\cdot 4=8).

Total: (3+8=11). [ \boxed{11} ]

Final Model Output
11

Comparative Analysis (P44) (Average across runs)

Avg Time Taken

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
1215.4
Deepseek-V3.2
975.6
Grok-4.1-fast
593.1
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
577.9
GPT-5.1 (high)
541.5
Solar-Open-100B
413.3
Claude-Opus-4.5
411.3
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
390.9
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking
299.1
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking-2601
223.0
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
196.4
GPT-5.2 (high)
194.4
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
157.7
A.X-4.0 (72B)
39.7
HCX-007(high)
25.3
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
24.1
axk1
12.6

Avg Token Usage

Claude-Opus-4.5
111449.0
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
109948.7
Grok-4.1-fast
96753.0
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
75673.0
Solar-Open-100B
61460.0
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking-2601
39629.0
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking
36070.0
GPT-5.1 (high)
33459.0
Deepseek-V3.2
29214.0
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
22016.0
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
20708.0
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
18795.0
GPT-5.2 (high)
14552.0
EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
9373.0
HCX-007(high)
3907.0
axk1
3892.0
A.X-4.0 (72B)
3217.0