Problem Analysis #31

12.39s
4,115 toks
Problem Statement

For all real numbers xx with 2x2-2 \leq x \leq 2, the inequalityk2x3+3x212x8k-k \leq 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 12x - 8 \leq kholds. Find the smallest possible positive value of kk. [3 points]\

Ground Truth
15
Execution Trace
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] We need to find the smallest positive ( k ) such that for all ( x \in [-2, 2] ), the cubic polynomial ( f(x) = 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 12x - 8 ) satisfies ( -k \le f(x) \le k ).

That is equivalent to ( |f(x)| \le k ) for all ( x \in [-2, 2] ). So ( k ) must be at least the maximum absolute value of ( f(x) ) on ([-2, 2]). The smallest possible ( k ) is ( \max_{x \in [-2, 2]} |f(x)| ).

We can find this maximum by:

  1. Finding critical points inside ((-2, 2)) by solving ( f'(x) = 0 ).
  2. Evaluating ( |f(x)| ) at critical points and endpoints.
  3. Taking the maximum.

Let's compute ( f'(x) = 6x^2 + 6x - 12 = 6(x^2 + x - 2) = 6(x+2)(x-1) ). So critical points: ( x = -2 ) and ( x = 1 ). Note ( x = -2 ) is an endpoint, ( x = 1 ) is interior.

Thus interior critical point: ( x = 1 ). Endpoints: ( x = -2, 2 ).

We'll evaluate ( f(x) ) at ( x = -2, 1, 2 ) and also check if there are other critical points? Wait, derivative zero at ( x = -2 ) and ( x = 1 ). But ( x = -2 ) is endpoint. So only interior critical point: ( x = 1 ).

But we must also consider that the maximum of ( |f(x)| ) could occur at endpoints or at critical points. Let's compute ( f ) at these points.

Let's do it in Python. [/THOUGHT] [PYTHON] import sympy as sp

x = sp.symbols('x') f = 2x**3 + 3x**2 - 12*x - 8

Evaluate at endpoints and critical point

points = [-2, 1, 2] values = [abs(f.subs(x, pt)) for pt in points] print("Values of |f(x)| at points -2, 1, 2:", values)

Also check if any other critical points? derivative = 6x^2 + 6x -12

Solve f'(x)=0: 6x^2+6x-12=0 => x^2+x-2=0 => (x+2)(x-1)=0 => x=-2,1.

So no other interior critical points.

But maybe maximum of |f| occurs at points where f' doesn't exist? f is polynomial, so differentiable everywhere.

So candidates: endpoints -2, 2, and critical point 1.

Let's also check if there are points where f(x)=0? Not needed for max |f|.

max_abs = max(values) print("Maximum |f(x)| among these points:", max_abs)

To be thorough, we can check the function's behavior numerically over the interval.

import numpy as np xs = np.linspace(-2, 2, 10001) ys = 2xs**3 + 3xs**2 - 12*xs - 8 abs_ys = np.abs(ys) max_abs_num = np.max(abs_ys) print("Maximum |f(x)| over fine grid:", max_abs_num) print("Corresponding x:", xs[np.argmax(abs_ys)])

Also, we can find exact maximum of |f| by considering f(x) positive and negative ranges.

But the numerical check should be fine.

Let's also verify that the inequality holds for this k.

k = max_abs print("k =", k)

Check inequality at a few random points

import random for _ in range(10): pt = random.uniform(-2, 2) val = 2pt**3 + 3pt**2 - 12*pt - 8 if not (-k <= val <= k): print("Violation at x =", pt, "val =", val) break else: print("Inequality holds for random points with k =", k)

Output exact k if possible.

The values at -2, 1, 2:

f_at_m2 = f.subs(x, -2) f_at_1 = f.subs(x, 1) f_at_2 = f.subs(x, 2) print("f(-2) =", f_at_m2, "|f(-2)| =", abs(f_at_m2)) print("f(1) =", f_at_1, "|f(1)| =", abs(f_at_1)) print("f(2) =", f_at_2, "|f(2)| =", abs(f_at_2))

The maximum absolute value is max(|f(-2)|, |f(1)|, |f(2)|).

max_exact = max(abs(f_at_m2), abs(f_at_1), abs(f_at_2)) print("Exact max |f|:", max_exact) print("Exact max |f| as integer?", max_exact.evalf()) [/PYTHON]

Tool Output
[PYTHON OUTPUT] Values of |f(x)| at points -2, 1, 2: [12, 15, 4] Maximum |f(x)| among these points: 15 Maximum |f(x)| over fine grid: 15.0 Corresponding x: 1.0 k = 15 Inequality holds for random points with k = 15 f(-2) = 12 |f(-2)| = 12 f(1) = -15 |f(1)| = 15 f(2) = -4 |f(2)| = 4 Exact max |f|: 15 Exact max |f| as integer? 15.0000000000000 [/PYTHON OUTPUT]
Reasoning Process

[THOUGHT] The maximum absolute value of ( f(x) = 2x^3 + 3x^2 - 12x - 8 ) on the interval ([-2, 2]) is 15, occurring at ( x = 1 ). Therefore, the smallest possible positive ( k ) is 15.

\boxed{15}

Final Model Output
15

Comparative Analysis (P31) (Average across runs)

Avg Time Taken

EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
2301.7
Solar-Open-100B
640.8
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
189.6
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
170.7
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
98.0
Deepseek-V3.2
67.5
HCX-007(high)
54.8
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
35.0
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking
33.8
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking-2601
21.2
A.X-4.0 (72B)
15.2
GPT-5.2 (high)
14.8
GPT-5.1 (high)
13.3
Claude-Opus-4.5
12.6
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
12.4
Grok-4.1-fast
10.0
axk1
4.4

Avg Token Usage

EXAONE-4.0.1-32B (high)
37496.0
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
27042.0
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking
7460.0
Solar-Pro-2 (31B)(high)
7096.0
HCX-007(high)
5642.0
Kanana-2-30B-Thinking-2601
5493.5
Solar-Open-100B
5057.0
Llama-VARCO-8B-Instruct
4580.0
GPT-5.2 (high)
4360.0
Gemini-3-Pro-Preview
4189.0
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
4115.0
Grok-4.1-fast
3931.0
Deepseek-V3.2
3561.0
Claude-Opus-4.5
3451.0
A.X-4.0 (72B)
3174.0
GPT-5.1 (high)
3116.0
axk1
2308.0